The Roles of Art

I find it interesting in the way art almost entirely reflects the artist. Of course this seems obvious, but there’s also unintentional ways it reflects the artist. This is noticeable when you take a writer who doesn’t make an outline for their writing. If they begin to just write and see what comes out, it almost always expresses subtle traits of the writer. The tone they use, the events they portray, the characters they establish, it all reveals their subconscious feelings. This is why when you’re done reading a good book you feel as if you personally know a writer because of how much of their personality you’ve picked up.

After consuming all forms of art, paintings, writing, music, ect, you begin to notice a trend in topics. The universal themes artists are usually to make a point or to get the audience to feel a certain way. Themes like war, conflict, relationships, money, and nature are used to guide the audience to the conclusion the artist intended. For instance in Remarque’s novel “All Quiet on the Western Front” the brutal imagery of WWI is used to establish a relatively anti-war message. The author saw an issue with the current state of things so he wrote the novel as not only a record of it but as an argument against it. But notice how if there were no wars there would be no point to write an anti-war novel. Another example would be Steinbeck’s “The Grapes of Wrath”, if there were no dust bowl, the book would not have to be written. This shows how many times art is used as an argument against a certain established event/tradition, and often shows a proposal for a different one. Because of this many forms of art carry a counter-culture message.

Art can be seen as a form of protest, but protest against what can be an interesting topic. In the artist’s argument against the way things are they can also be arguing for more of what the system already is. The famous philosopher Slavoj Zizek points the author Ayn Rand as what he calls “Over Orthodox.”  He further describes it as such:

They are absolute conformists in the sense that they spell out the secret premises of the ruling ideology in such clear, radical ways, that it’s inacceptable and an embarrassment for the ruling ideology itself.

Really this depends on the point of view you take. Artists such as Rand may have seen the ruling ideology much differently, which in her mind would make it seem as if she were arguing, not for the system in place, but against it. Whichever point of view is more truthful is debatable. But this shows that what artists argue for isn’t always the exact opposite of what’s in place. Depending on your point of view, since an artist can either argue for against the system in place, many forms of art can be seen as either enforcing the status quo or questioning it.

I know that when you try to lump everything complex into two categories not everything fits, but there is some truth to this. Think of propaganda posters. They are there usually to enforce the status quo, make people think a certain way, and to portray the the enemies as subhuman. This is true for no matter what kind of propaganda poster it is. If it was American propaganda against the Japanese in WWII, or early communist propaganda against the czars. The second case is special because it is used to promote a different way of thinking, in this case an anti-czarist message, so it would promote the questioning of the status quo while the first case enforces it.

Even more abstract works of art can lead to this. One of the traits of abstract art is that it is suppose to guide the consumer to a certain feeling. Just the feeling itself can enforce the status quo or not. Even if the piece of art is in no way political, feelings of anger, sadness, confusion, empathy, love, all inspire the person to question things more.

But then there are some things that sort of fit in the middle. Pop music makes a good example. Many times the auto-tuned person singing doesn’t really have a message besides partying, sex, or having fun. This can be seen as counter-culture if you believe acts like partying or sex inherently are against the status quo. But while this can be true, art such as this only further enforce the ruling ideology because they fail to make the person think. I can listen to a lot of songs about partying, and while it may seem rebellious, it would only indoctrinate me further to the culture. To begin to question the status quo the person has to first be able to think, and if the art they consume is all mindless then the art only further enforces the prevalent system of thought.

I would go on to argue that certain bands became famous because they made people think and they made them question the world around them. Bands like Pink Floyd or Radiohead are known for this. But there are other ways the ruling ideology gets support. So if a new band comes out and they sing about rebellion and revolution and all that, it won’t do much good if the millions of dollars they make all goes to the giant record production company. While what they sing about may be counter-culture, they are simultaneously working against themselves by supporting the company. I believe this is why so many bands prefer to stay “indie” and local.

Art can be a tricky thing to dissect. For some people it reflects their entire lives, while for others it frightens them and they can’t seem to wrap their head around it. But a good way to judge a person’s character is to look at what art they consume, because it says more of their deep feelings than they’ll let on. That’s another beautiful thing about art, it lets us convey things we can’t always articulate, whether we know it or not.

23 thoughts on “The Roles of Art

Add yours

  1. I believe great authors, those who have survived generations, lead from the heart. They are moved by the currents of their times to write about what they see, in a personal way. They are not manipulating their readers toward a limited point of view, but giving them a unique perspective for consideration.

    Propaganda and advertising are different, and you can’t compare the two. Under the onslaught of everyone trying to sell you something, or to make demands on your senses, as with machine noise, people have been deafened to the point of fatigue. I believe that’s why people are going more local, with beings who exist in the tangible present. Let the electronic world take a break. The frenzy is enough to drive people crazy. Reading great literature is the opposite. Peaceful, quiet, and at my pace.

    Liked by 5 people

  2. Social realism to portray the ground reality in society is best art, be it painting or song or poem or novel! The exploitation of mass by a minority, women’s oppression, child labour of abuse, sexual harassment, etc; nay, the reality on ground, emanating from the greed of profit, that leads to even war!

    Liked by 3 people

    1. Edited version of my comment above- Social realism to portray the ground reality in society is best art, be it painting or song or poem or novel! The exploitation of mass by a minority, women’s oppression, child labour or abuse, sexual harassment, etc; nay, the reality on ground, emanating from the greed for profit, that leads to even war!


  3. I can relate to this. When I try to write to a specific moral or theme or “message” it works less well for me, so I mostly set out, as you say, without much of an outline – just a handful of characters and an opening scene, then let the characters tell the story themselves. Yes, these are facets of my own unconscious, and much of the pleasure I get from writing fiction is in seeing these otherwise hidden aspects of myself.

    Thanks for liking my recent piece by the way. Glad to have found you.




  4. I’m so glad to have found your site, we seem to be on the same wave level on just about every issue. The dream of having every child get all of the information needed to form his or her own opinions, ideas, point-of-view, is priceless. I have five great grandchildren, all of whom are fortunate to be learning to think and reach conclusions on their own from very young ages. The thing that bothers me the most about education is that so much time is spent at schools delving into issues that are counter-productive to a learning environment. I could go on and on, but one point is this: the kids who are kicked out of school–for whatever reason–are the very ones who should be there. Expulsion is convenient for administrations, but disastrous to chidren. Enough… 🙂

    Liked by 1 person

  5. You have an interesting perspective and while I agree overall, I think that you’ve both oversimplified and overgeneralized in a few places. Art can be a very powerful argument to think and to question, as you’ve said. Then there is art that by not making people think actually supports the status quo. That’s a good point and pop music is a good example. On the other hand, many artists are simply aiming for an aesthetic or sensory experience (not even emotional, since certain sounds or colours, for example, don’t inherently convey certain emotions – convention, context, and culture all play a role in how we interpret things).

    I’m also not sure that experiencing love, empathy, confusion, anger, etc. in relation to an abstract piece of art necessarily inspires a person to question more. My guess is that many people respond with “Art is weird” or “I don’t get it” or “The artist failed to convey their message properly” (as if they MUST have a message).

    All that being said, there’s no doubt that art can play a crucial role in challenging or improving the status quo, as well as making people more aware of the good aspects of the status quo, which can also be important.


  6. Your writing is so poignant and articulate, thank you for yet another wonderful post. The relationship between art and politics is currently of high interest to me, so this was helpful. I don’t think art is ever apolitical.

    Liked by 1 person

  7. Very well said. I am glad I found your blog, I’ll certainly be back. Interesting thoughts on writers who don’t outline. I primarily write poetry, but when I do venture into fiction I don’t outline. I have tried to do so many times, as that’s the way it’s supposed to work, but it never went well for me.


  8. Your mention of Pink Floyd put me to thinking of a joke made with my love, that the plot of every rock opera is “a future dystopia has outlawed music and the lead singer brings it crashing to the ground”. Which isn’t even true, but feels like it is.


  9. Interesting analysis considering that much of the art that is presented for consecutive generations to consume always has some hidden form of propaganda attached to it. Signs and symbols are the common method of communication. If you can learn to decipher them, you have a good start. What may appear to seem meaningless, may in fact be heavily layered with messages that the casual consumer will often miss. When it comes to art as with everything else “under the sun” you must first follow the money trail. Have a great weekend. You have a new follower. Thank you for visiting my artist blog and liking my latest post.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at

Up ↑

%d bloggers like this: